Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41691429›Full record

ReviewAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2026

Decoding NASICON and Its Metal Interface for Solid-State Batteries.

Jiaqi Xu, Taiguang Li, Ying Wang, Ruosi Qiao, Quinn Qiao, Yu Chen, Zhou Yu, Chunyi Zhi, Changmin Shi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interfacial Failure and Self-Healing in Solid-State Batteries.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Interfacial Stabilization of LiChemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jiaqi XuDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Taiguang LiDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Ying WangDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ruosi QiaoDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Quinn QiaoDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Yu ChenDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zhou YuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA.
Chunyi ZhiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6766-5953
Changmin ShiDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1978-7352

Funding

National Science Foundation NSF-2052611NSF Regional Innovation Engines program NSF-2315695Syracuse University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solid-state batteries (SSBs) are among the most promising next-generation energy storage technologies, offering exceptional safety, high energy density, and fast-charging capability. Among all kinds of solid electrolytes, sodium super ionic conductor (NASICON) is one of the most promising candidates due to its inexpensive material precursors, air stability, and high ionic conductivity. However, it faces a critical challenge: interfacial instability with metal anodes, leading to dendrite formation and penetration that ultimately cause battery failure. Addressing this issue requires a systematic understanding of the solid electrolyte itself, interfacial failure mechanisms, and robust mitigation strategies. Therefore, this review focuses on NASICON as a model system for both sodium- and lithium-based SSBs, providing a comprehensive overview and new insights into NASICON and its metal interfaces. A top-down approach is adopted, beginning with the fundamentals of NASICON's crystallography, thermodynamics, and kinetics to elucidate its intrinsic properties and interfacial degradation behaviors. Advanced characterization techniques for probing such failures are then reviewed, followed by a comprehensive discussion of mitigation strategies targeting the electrolyte, electrode, and their interface, along with practical insights into NASICON manufacturing. Finally, future research directions are proposed to guide the advancement of NASICON-based SSBs toward practical commercialization.

Indexed as

design fundamentals and strategieselectrolyte and metal interfacelithium NASICONsodium NASICONsolid‐state battery

Identifiers

PMID41691429
PMCPMC13003917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.