ArticleBMC psychology2026
Examining mediating pathways among factors associated with adolescent dissociative experiences: a gender-stratified structural equation modeling analysis.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFew studies have investigated the direct and interactive associations between different gender adolescent dissociative experiences (ADEs) and impact factors. This study aimed to analyze the mediating associations of factors influencing ADEs.
methodsWe used a structural equation model (SEM) to explore the direct, interactive, and mediating associations between ADEs and influencing factors by gender stratification. A two-center cross-sectional study was conducted in Hangzhou City, China. The sample comprised 2,400 adolescents who were randomly selected using a multi-phase, stratified, cluster sampling technique.
resultsA total of 2,114 participants were included in this study. The ADEs scores in boys were higher than in girls (t = 5.21, p < 0.001). SEM revealed significant direct associations between ADEs in boys and three primary impact factors: mental health parameters (anxiety and sleep/dietary patterns: β = 0.37, p < 0.001), family environment characteristics (conflict and expressiveness: β = 0.16, p < 0.001), and teacher-student conflict (β = 0.19, p = 0.006). Furthermore, mental health factors demonstrated significant mediating associations, explaining 16.7% (β = 0.03, p = 0.006) and 30.5% (β = 0.09, p < 0.001) of the total associations linking family environment and teacher-student conflict to boys ADEs, respectively. Whilst, family environment and teacher-student conflict play a mediating part (β = 0.12, p < 0.001) in the indirect link between mental health and boys ADEs. According to the SEM analysis in girls, among the variables that affected ADEs just through the direct path, the variable of peer interpersonal interaction had a negative relationship (β = -0.06, p = 0.047), but mental health (psychoticism, paranoid ideation, somatic complaints, obsessive–compulsive, hostility) (β = 0.66, p < 0.001) had the most positive relationship with ADEs. The peer interpersonal interaction (β = 0.11, p = 0.002) mediates the relationship between mental health and girls ADEs.
conclusionsThis study indicated that significant gender differences were evident in both the influencing factors and the mediating associations of factors related to ADEs. Evidently, the present cross-sectional SEM—under rigorous measurement, strong model fit, plausible quasi-stationarity, and conservative interpretation—offers a defensible framework for estimating contemporaneous associations in time-varying psychosocial constructs. These findings can guide hypothesis generation and inform the design of longitudinal studies and pilot interventions, while avoiding causal claims.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.