ArticleCardio-oncology (London, England)2026
Outcomes of patients with systemic light chain amyloidosis treated with DVD front-line therapy.
Article in Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-Term Outcomes of Mayo Stage IIIb AL Amyloidosis Treated With Daratumumab-Based Frontline Therapy.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A substantial proportion of patients are unsuitable candidates for the Dara-CyBorD regimen (daratumumab-cyclophosphamide-bortezomib-dexamethasone), the standard frontline treatment for systemic amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis as established in the ANDROMEDA clinical trial. This is primarily due to their severe organ dysfunction and limited treatment tolerance. In this work, we evaluated an alternative frontline regimen of DVD (daratumumab-bortezomib-dexamethasone) in 64 newly diagnosed patients with AL amyloidosis, including those with advanced cardiac disease. The best hematologic response achieved was a complete response (CR) in 56.3% of patients, with very good partial response (VGPR) or better observed in 68.8%, not inferior to the hematologic responses reported in the ANDROMEDA trial. At 6 months, 13 (48.1%) achieved a cardiac response and 17 (85.0%) achieved a renal response, compared favourably to the data in ANDROMEDA. Notably, the incidence of grade ≥ 3 infections was 1.6%, significantly lower than the 7.8% reported in ANDROMEDA. The estimated 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 84.4% and 82.8%, respectively. The profound hematologic response rates (VGPR/CR) in mayo stage IIIB patients were comparable to those in mayo stage I-IIIA patients, while the median OS of stage IIIB patients was significantly shorter than that of stage I-IIIA patients. No therapy-related deaths or permanent treatment discontinuation due to toxicity were observed. Overall, our findings demonstrate that the DVD regimen is both effective and well-tolerated, even in patients with advanced cardiac involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.