Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41691325›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

Latent profiles analysis of spiritual orientation and psychological well-being among female healthcare workers.

Mualla Dikmen, Filiz Elmalı

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mualla DikmenFırat University, Elâzığ, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6384-517X
Filiz ElmalıFırat University, Elâzığ, Turkey. fvarol@firat.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5060-7383

Funding

Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Fırat University EF.25.15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to identify latent profiles of spiritual orientation (SO) and psychological well-being (PWB) among female healthcare workers and to examine how demographic factors predict profile membership. A total of 104 female healthcare professionals from two hospitals in eastern Türkiye were recruited using purposive criterion sampling. Participants completed validated self-report measures assessing SO and PWB. Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) with varying means, equal variances, and covariances fixed to zero (Model 1) was conducted to uncover distinct profiles based on standardized mean scores. Four profiles were identified: “Low Spirituality-Low Well-Being” (5.8%), “Moderate Spirituality-Low Well-Being” (13.5%), “High Spirituality–High Well-Being” (61.5%), and “Low Spirituality-High Well-Being” (19.2%). The four-class solution demonstrated superior fit indices (BIC = 1737.0, entropy = 0.956) compared to alternative models. Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that education level, tenure, and marital status standing significantly predicted membership in the more adaptive profiles, particularly the “High Spirituality–High Well-Being” group. Notably, a moderate positive correlation (r = .40, p < .001) was observed between SO and PWB. These findings highlight the heterogeneity of spiritual-psychological functioning in female healthcare workers and underscore the potential buffering role of socioeconomic and professional factors. The person-centered approach employed in this study provides nuanced insight into the complex interplay between spirituality and well-being in high-stress healthcare environments. The results offer implications for designing individualized interventions that consider both the spiritual and emotional needs of healthcare workers.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPsychological Well-BeingSpiritualityAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedFemale healthcare workersLatent profile analysisPsychological well-beingSpiritual orientation

Identifiers

PMID41691325
PMCPMC13011665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.