ArticleCritical care (London, England)2026
Centralization of post-resuscitation care after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest at cardiac arrest centres: a Danish nationwide follow-up study.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The frequency and complexity of pediatric hospitalizations to pediatric and adult departments in Germany.BMC pediatrics · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent guidelines recommend centralization of post-resuscitation care in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA)-patients. Centralization has been gradually implemented in Denmark since 2009; however, no evaluation of centralization has yet been made. This study assesses the 30-day mortality before and after centralization, and the impact of centralization on survival in Denmark.
methodsThis nationwide study included consecutive adult OHCA patients with presumed cardiac cause admitted to a hospital. Centralization was introduced in 2009, 2011, and 2012 in four out of five regions. Temporal trends of 30-day mortality were evaluated in patients who were directly transported to CACs and in patients who were transported to non-CACs. A difference-in-difference model with repeated cross-sections was used to estimate the effect of centralization on the 30-day mortality between 2007 and 2020. The model was adjusted for additive effects of known covariates.
resultsA total of 14,276 patients were included. The majority of patients were aged between 50 to 75 years (57%) and 71% were male. From 2007 to 2020, the risk of 30-day mortality was reduced from 66 to 47% among patients transported to CACs and from 92 to 74% in patients transported to non-CACs. Centralization was significantly associated with an absolute risk reduction in mortality of 7% (95% CI: 2%-11%).
conclusionsIn this study, a mortality decline was observed for patients transported to CACs and non-CACs. Centralization was associated with a significant reduction of the absolute 30-day mortality risk of 7% after accounting for regional differences, time-trends in patients, and OHCA characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.