ArticleGenome medicine2026
Multiomics assessment of lung adenocarcinoma subtypes defined through tumor purity-adjusted DNA methylation.
Article in Genome medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multiomics assessment of lung adenocarcinoma subtypes defined through tumor purity-adjusted DNA methylation.Genome medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMolecular subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) with varying prognosis and characteristics have been proposed based on one or two-dimensional studies but are not yet implemented into clinical routine. Epigenetic modifications in cancer cells are independent of sequence variants, directly linked to gene and genome regulation, and thus provide important information to guide subclassification efforts.
methodsWe performed in-depth epigenomic profiling of 95 primary LUAD samples from a Swedish discovery cohort with comprehensive clinicopathological, epigenomic, genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data. Additionally, we estimated pure tumor cell methylomes using a computational approach. We subdivided the discovery cohort into four epigenetic subtypes, the epitypes, reflecting distinct tumor cell methylation states. Resulting epitypes were contrasted based on clinicopathological and molecular features, and our main findings were validated in two additional primary tumor cohorts totaling over 700 samples.
resultsOf the four DNA methylation epitypes, M1-M4, M1 and M4 were associated with the previously proposed mRNA subtypes Terminal Respiratory Unit and Proximal Proliferative, respectively. Epitypes M2 and M3 showed similar mRNA/protein subtype composition but differed with respect to e.g., higher expression of the LUAD histology-associated NAPSA/surfactant metabolism expression metagene in M3. Genes included in this metagene showed lower DNA methylation in M3, counter to a global tendency towards promoter hypermethylation in this epitype. To further delineate tumor intrinsic links between the epigenomic and expression phenotypes, 62 LUAD cell lines classified into the four epitypes were investigated and recapitulated several characteristics from the tumor epitypes, such as methylation and expression pattens of NAPSA/surfactant genes, highlighting epigenetic states as likely drivers or maintainers of broad tumor phenotypes and differentiation states.
conclusionsDissecting LUAD based on combined biological characteristics using multiomics data has deepened our understanding of the heterogeneity in this complex disease and the mechanisms underlying phenotype formation and maintenance. There remains a critical need for large, publicly accessible, well-annotated multiomic LUAD cohorts to support rigorous subtype discovery and validation, particularly those linked to targeted therapy trial outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.