ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2026
Comprehensive analysis of copy number variations in congenital heart defects Tunisian patients: chromosomal microarray analysis insights.
Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
38 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCongenital heart defects represent a major global health burden, affecting nearly one million newborns annually. Identifying the underlying genetic causes is essential for improved diagnosis, patient management, and genetic counseling. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe conducted a cytogenetic study integrating conventional karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA 44 K) in 20 Tunisian patients presenting syndromic CHDs and referred to our Genetics Department. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: CMA identified pathogenic copy number variations in four patients. These included an inherited 11 Mb deletion at 9p24.2 together with a 10 Mb duplication of 20pter; a de novo 1.2 Mb deletion at 15q26.2 with an 11 Mb duplication at 2q36.3; a de novo 113 kb deletion at 17q21.32; and a de novo 48 Mb duplication at 8q22. Several CNVs overlapped known deletion/duplication syndromes, some with previously infrequent cardiac involvement. Genotype-phenotype correlations enabled prioritization of CHD relevant genes including DOCK8, HTR2B, KANSL1, ZFPM2, and TRPS1, whose dosage sensitivity and interactions with cardiac developmental pathways may contribute to the observed phenotypes.
conclusionThis study reinforces the clinical utility of CMA in detecting cryptic chromosomal abnormalities in syndromic CHD. The identified CNVs and gene candidates offer new insights into CHD genetic architecture and support CMA as a first-tier diagnostic tool. These findings highlight the contribution of rare, pathogenic CNVs in syndromic cases and suggest their integration into refined diagnostic and counseling strategies. Further functional studies are necessary to elucidate the roles of these candidates in cardiogenesis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.