ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Pectus excavatum in adults over 40: a retrospective review of surgical experience.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pectus Excavatum: An Elusive Diagnosis in Adults But Not an Illusion.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPectus excavatum is the most common congenital anterior chest wall deformity, typically corrected during adolescence. However, an increasing number of adult patients seek surgical repair due to persistent symptoms or cosmetic concerns. Surgical correction in adults poses unique challenges, and data on outcomes in older patients remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics, surgical techniques, and postoperative outcomes of pectus excavatum repair in patients aged 40 years and older.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed adult patients aged ≥ 40 who underwent surgical repair for pectus excavatum at our center between 2012 and 2025. Clinical indications, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. Patients younger than 40 years were used as a comparative cohort. Postoperative complications were categorized as minor or major according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system.
resultsA total of 16 patients (mean age: 46.9 years) underwent minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). A cross-bar configuration was applied in 56.3% of patients, and two or more bars were required in 87.5%. The most common surgical indication was symptomatic presentation (50%). Postoperative complications occurred in 5 patients (31.3%), including 3 major and 2 minor events. Compared with younger patients (n = 1180), the older cohort demonstrated a higher complication rate, although this difference did not reach statistical significance.
conclusionSurgical repair of pectus excavatum in patients over the age of 40 is feasible and safe when appropriate techniques are applied. Despite increased anatomical stiffness necessitating complex configurations, acceptable clinical outcomes can be achieved. Age alone should not be considered a contraindication for pectus repair in well-selected adult patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.