Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41691252›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Proactive postgraduate education in disaster medicine and preparedness for enhanced disaster management.

Jonas Zimmerman, Amir Khorram-Manesh, Yohan Robinson, Diana Swolin-Eide, Viktor Glantz, Eric Carlström, Joakim Björås

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonas ZimmermanInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. Jonas.zimmerman@gu.se.
Amir Khorram-ManeshInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Yohan RobinsonInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Diana Swolin-EideDepartment of Pediatrics, Institute for Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Viktor GlantzCenter for Disaster Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Eric CarlströmCenter for Disaster Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Joakim BjöråsInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDisaster preparedness is crucial for managing complex emergencies, yet educational frameworks are often underdeveloped or inconsistently applied across national contexts. This study introduces and evaluates the PRAD-MED (Preparedness and Disaster Medicine) program, a novel educational initiative developed in Sweden to enhance disaster response among healthcare professionals. Inspired by global competency frameworks, the program aimed to integrate theoretical, practical, and collaborative learning approaches, nationally and internationally, to strengthen organizational and individual preparedness in a structured manner. METHODOLOGY: The study employed a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative data were collected through a 29-question survey, assessing participants’ knowledge, confidence, and perceived relevance of the program. Focus group interviews and observational assessments provided qualitative insights into experiences and the programs impact on interdisciplinary collaboration, leadership, and organizational preparedness. The program featured a modular design with tabletop and modular simulation exercises.

resultsSixteen physicians participated, representing diverse medical specialties. Quantitative findings showed significant improvements in knowledge, with 94% of participants rating their post program disaster medicine proficiency as “high” or “very high.” Leadership and collaboration skills were highly rated, with 87% identifying enhanced decision-making and teamwork capabilities. Qualitative data, including observers reports emphasized the transformative impact of simulations and cross-sectoral exercises, fostering a deeper understanding of roles and communication in disaster scenarios.

conclusionThe PRAD-MED program demonstrated strong potential to address existing gaps in disaster medicine education by equipping healthcare professionals with the knowledge and skills required to serve as future instructors in disaster simulation and preparedness. By emphasizing leadership, interdisciplinary collaboration, and practical exercises, the program likely enhanced participants’ readiness for future emergencies. Ongoing participant involvement in subsequent course rounds is believed to have fostered a sustainable and expanding training model. Continued development through broader stakeholder engagement and integration of advanced training technologies may further strengthen long-term disaster preparedness across Sweden.

Indexed as

Disaster MedicineDisaster PlanningEducation, Medical, ContinuingEducation, Medical, GraduateClinical CompetenceFocus GroupsHumansLeadershipProgram EvaluationSwedenCrisis leadershipDisaster educationDisaster medicine managementHealth system preparednessInterprofessional collaborationSimulation-based training

Identifiers

PMID41691252
PMCPMC12930613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.