Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41691229›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2026

The Learning Cycle method: an approach to rapidly bring evidence to the point of decision-making for health system planning.

Morgan Price, Amanda Frazer, Elka Humphrys, Angela Randall, Tlell Elviss, Sarah Fletcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Morgan PriceFaculty of Medicine, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. morgan.price@ubc.ca.
Amanda FrazerFaculty of Medicine, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Elka HumphrysFaculty of Medicine, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Angela RandallFaculty of Medicine, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Tlell ElvissFaculty of Medicine, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Sarah FletcherFaculty of Medicine, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth systems often struggle to integrate local and published evidence into timely policy decisions, particularly in complex and rapidly evolving environments such as primary care. While learning healthcare systems (LHS) principles advocate for continuous learning through real-world application, practical methods for operationalizing this without infrastructure can be challenging. To address this gap, we developed the Learning Cycle method in collaboration with the British Columbia Ministry of Health to help drive action-oriented, evidence-informed change and support decision-making.

methodsA Learning Cycle is a low-barrier, rapid (8-12 weeks) knowledge mobilization approach that collects evidence and brings it into policy and/or planning decisions through participatory action methods. The process is initiated by a business owner who has a question that guides the focus of the cycle. The Learning Cycle Lead then manages the cycle, which has two phases: (1) a learning phase - where mixed sources of evidence are rapidly synthesized to address partner defined questions and (2) an action phase - where results are shared in a structured, constructive workshop with decision-makers to facilitate evidence-based planning. The business owner provides input and takes the feasible change ideas into implementation.

resultsTo date, 25 Learning Cycles have been completed by the British Columbia (BC) primary care Innovation Support Unit (ISU). Four illustrative case studies are presented to demonstrate the method's flexibility, responsiveness and utility in policy development, planning and system redesign. Contributors to successful Learning Cycles include securing buy-in and continued engagement from the business owner, aligning the cycle to a clear initial question, timing it right to a decision point and adapting to system conditions.

conclusionsThe Learning Cycle model demonstrates adaptability to different contexts, capacity to rapidly align evidence with decision-making needs and potential to embed learning functions across jurisdictional levels. The Learning Cycle is a lightweight method to mobilize evidence into policy and practice with minimal infrastructure, thus making it suitable for low-resource or structurally diffuse contexts, and complements more robust LHS approaches. Its structured yet flexible design advances core LHS strategies - continuous improvement, evidence integration and stakeholder co-production - making it a promising model for responsive and equity-focused health system transformation.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDelivery of Health CareEvidence-Based PracticeHealth PlanningHealth PolicyLearningLearning Health SystemPolicy MakingPrimary Health CareBritish ColumbiaHumansAction researchImplementationKnowledge mobilizationLearning CycleLearning health systemPrimary careQuality improvementRapid cycle

Identifiers

PMID41691229
PMCPMC13011708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.