ArticleBMC cancer2026
Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of bevacizumab-based treatments in recurrent primary brain tumors: a multicenter real-world Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBevacizumab is widely used for recurrent high-grade glioma, but the real-world effectiveness of bevacizumab with or without irinotecan remains uncertain. We evaluated outcomes of bevacizumab-based regimens in a large multicenter Turkish cohort.
methodsIn this retrospective study from 30 centers, adults with recurrent glioblastoma or other primary brain tumors treated with a bevacizumab-containing regimen at first or second progression were included. Patients received bevacizumab monotherapy, bevacizumab plus low-dose weekly irinotecan, or bevacizumab plus standard-dose irinotecan every 14 days. Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were assessed. Prognostic factors were analyzed using Cox regression.
resultsA total of 437 patients were included; 78.0% had glioblastoma. Treatment consisted of bevacizumab monotherapy in 9.4%, bevacizumab plus weekly irinotecan in 8.5%, and bevacizumab plus irinotecan every 14 days in 82.2% of patients. The objective response rate was 41.6%, and the disease control rate was 80.1%. Median OS was 10.77, 7.37 and 9.77 months (log-rank p = 0.024), and median PFS was 5.77, 3.93 and 6.43 months (p = 0.005), respectively. On multivariable analysis, glioblastoma histology independently predicted shorter PFS and OS, whereas a higher number of treatment cycles and antiepileptic drug use were associated with longer PFS. For OS, the irinotecan-bevacizumab every-14-day regimen and a higher number of treatment cycles were associated with improved survival compared with bevacizumab monotherapy, while baseline corticosteroid use and discontinuation of bevacizumab-containing therapy were independent adverse prognostic factors.
conclusionsIn this large real-world cohort, bevacizumab-based therapy achieved meaningful disease control and survival in recurrent primary brain tumors. An irinotecan-bevacizumab regimen administered every 14 days was associated with superior OS at the expense of increased but manageable chemotherapy-related toxicity, supporting its use in appropriately selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.