SynthesisBMC geriatrics2026
Perturbation-based balance training on treadmills for falls prevention in older adults: a review of training protocols and reporting recommendations (ProRePBT).
Synthesis in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Technology-Based Perturbation Training During Walking on Physical Function in Stroke, Multiple Sclerosis, and Parkinson's Disease: A Scoping Review.NeuroRehabilitation · 2026Article
- Validation of AI-based markerless gait event detection during perturbed walking using smartphone videos from two camera perspectives.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFalls are a leading cause of injuries in older adults, often resulting from slipping and tripping. Perturbation-based balance training (PBT) applied on treadmills is an emerging task-specific approach to falls prevention but standardized training protocols are lacking. This review presents an overview of PBT protocols on treadmills, their theoretical justification and proposes recommendations for standardized reporting.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, CENTRAL and Clinical Trials Registration on May 9, 2025 to identify RCTs, pilot studies, study protocols and trial registrations on treadmill-based PBT for falls prevention in healthy older adults or those diagnosed with stroke, Parkinson’s disease or multiple sclerosis. Studies were screened by two independent researchers. Data on general and PBT specific training parameters as well as the justification for those parameters were narratively synthesized.
results1253 studies were identified. The eligibility criteria were met by 69 publications referring to 36 research projects. In total, 1928 participants were included, with 950 participants in the PBT groups. The training periods lasted from a single session to 12 weeks, including one to three sessions per week, each from 20 to 60 min. During standing and walking, from 24 up to 160 unannounced perturbations were induced, consisting of treadmill belt acceleration and deceleration as well as lateral displacements. Training intensity was often individually adjusted based on participant performance or subjective feedback, though methods varied widely. Perturbation frequency timing and the perturbed leg, as well as the theoretical justification for the training parameters were rarely reported.
conclusionsThe results reveal a high heterogeneity in the PBT protocols. Furthermore, training parameters and their justification were insufficiently reported in many studies. Therefore, we propose a reporting standard for PBT protocols (ProRePBT) to increase comparability between studies, improve replicability, and facilitate implementation into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.