ArticleBMC public health2026
Sugar-sweetened beverages: consumption, purchasing behaviour, and opinions about policy measures in a nationally representative panel of Dutch secondary school adolescents.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite substantial public health efforts, reducing adolescents’ sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption remains challenging. While much is known about determinants, the underlying motivations for sustained popularity remain unclear. This study aims to (1) gain insights into the prevalence of perceptions and contextual influences surrounding SSB purchase and consumption in a representative sample of Dutch adolescents; and (2) to investigate adolescents’ opinions on presumed effects of policies to reduce SSB consumption. A cross-sectional, nationally representative survey in June 2021 among 839 Dutch students aged 12–16 was conducted, using an online questionnaire to assess dietary behaviours, including weekly consumption of SSBs (glasses/week). The results showed that over two-thirds of adolescents (72.6%) agreed that ‘Drinking soft drinks is normal.’ Across all adolescents, average consumption was 9.5 glasses per week; over half (51.7%) were defined as high consumers (≥ 7 glasses/week). Adolescents with constant home availability of SSBs had 14 times higher odds of being high consumers (95% CI 12.32–14.48), a significant association; they also tended to purchase SSBs more frequently and spent significantly more money on them, compared to those without home availability. Nearly half (49.7%) agreed that price increases would reduce their consumption. Overall, this study confirms that SSBs are widely consumed by adolescents and perceived as a normal, everyday choice. This normalization is reinforced by their availability and low cost. Fiscal measures and targeted interventions in settings such as supermarkets hold promise for reducing SSB consumption. Future research should explore alternatives to SSBs and assess the effectiveness of relevant policies to reduce consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.