ArticleBMC genomics2026
Genomics-based assessment of the geographic origin of spongy moths (Lymantria dispar) intercepted during vessel inspections, using SpongySeq, an amplicon sequencing panel.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInvasive alien species (IAS) are a major threat to native biodiversity, ecosystems services, economic stability and human well-being. The two spongy moths, Lymantria dispar asiatica and L. dispar japonica, native from Asia, are important defoliators of a wide variety of hardwood and coniferous trees, and the risk of their introduction into North America via sea transport is considered high by plant protection regulatory authorities. To prevent such introductions, a cost-effective approach consists in reducing the likelihood that IAS will enter the invasion pathway. This involves identifying the geographic origins of moths intercepted during vessel inspections in North American ports and implementing preventative measures in those foreign ports identified as the sources of moths. In the present work, we designed a genomic-based method for the accurate identification of the geographic origins of intercepted spongy moths. To this end, we developed an AmpliSeq panel, named SpongySeq, using genotyping-by-sequencing-derived SNP obtained from 1156 spongy moths collected at 61 sites in 25 countries.
resultsThe 283 SNPs that make up the panel were selected based on their performance to accurately assign spongy moths to one of the 19 geographic groups identified here, through assignment analyses using three different models, i.e., a multivariate approach, discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC), and two supervised learning methods named Support-Vector-Machine and Naïve Bayes. With the most performant model (DAPC), our SpongySeq panel displayed a high assignment accuracy varying between 82 and 97%, depending on the assignment threshold used. Using this assignment method, an assessment of the origins of 28 egg masses of Asian spongy moths intercepted in different US ports in 2019–20, indicated that the majority were from Japan (18).
conclusionsThis research demonstrates the feasibility to predict provenance and mitigate invasion of an important invasive species using a medium-size subset of selected genetic markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.