Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41691151›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2026

Genomics-based assessment of the geographic origin of spongy moths (Lymantria dispar) intercepted during vessel inspections, using SpongySeq, an amplicon sequencing panel.

Sandrine Picq, Arnaud Capron, Julien Prunier, Brian Boyle, Abdelmadjid Djoumad, Don Stewart, Yunke Wu, Richard Hamelin, Michel Cusson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sandrine PicqLaurentian Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Quebec City, QC, Canada. sandrine.picq@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1436-3307
Arnaud CapronDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Julien PrunierGenovalia, Institut Intelligence et Données (IID), Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4839-3857
Brian BoylePlateforme d'Analyses Génomiques, Institut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes (IBIS), Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0158-1463
Abdelmadjid DjoumadLaurentian Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Don StewartLaurentian Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Yunke WuUSDA-APHIS-PPQ, Forest Pest Methods Laboratory, Buzzards Bay, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6375-6580
Richard HamelinDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4006-532X
Michel CussonLaurentian Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1541-6052

Funding

Genome Canada #182IAS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvasive alien species (IAS) are a major threat to native biodiversity, ecosystems services, economic stability and human well-being. The two spongy moths, Lymantria dispar asiatica and L. dispar japonica, native from Asia, are important defoliators of a wide variety of hardwood and coniferous trees, and the risk of their introduction into North America via sea transport is considered high by plant protection regulatory authorities. To prevent such introductions, a cost-effective approach consists in reducing the likelihood that IAS will enter the invasion pathway. This involves identifying the geographic origins of moths intercepted during vessel inspections in North American ports and implementing preventative measures in those foreign ports identified as the sources of moths. In the present work, we designed a genomic-based method for the accurate identification of the geographic origins of intercepted spongy moths. To this end, we developed an AmpliSeq panel, named SpongySeq, using genotyping-by-sequencing-derived SNP obtained from 1156 spongy moths collected at 61 sites in 25 countries.

resultsThe 283 SNPs that make up the panel were selected based on their performance to accurately assign spongy moths to one of the 19 geographic groups identified here, through assignment analyses using three different models, i.e., a multivariate approach, discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC), and two supervised learning methods named Support-Vector-Machine and Naïve Bayes. With the most performant model (DAPC), our SpongySeq panel displayed a high assignment accuracy varying between 82 and 97%, depending on the assignment threshold used. Using this assignment method, an assessment of the origins of 28 egg masses of Asian spongy moths intercepted in different US ports in 2019–20, indicated that the majority were from Japan (18).

conclusionsThis research demonstrates the feasibility to predict provenance and mitigate invasion of an important invasive species using a medium-size subset of selected genetic markers.

Indexed as

GenomicsIntroduced SpeciesLymantria disparMothsAnimalsAsiaGeographyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNAAssignment analysesFlighted spongy moth complex (FSMC)Genotyping-by-sequencingInvasive speciesLepidopteraPopulation structure

Identifiers

PMID41691151
PMCPMC12997923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.