Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41691132›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Feasibility of BMI-based sub-milliSievert low-dose CT in individualized detection of lung nodules.

Siqi Qu, Qiuxing Chen, Shulin Li, Qijia Han, Zhu Ai, Minyi Wu, Kun Ma, Zhiming Xiang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Siqi QuPostgraduate cultivation base of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Qiuxing ChenPostgraduate cultivation base of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Shulin LiPostgraduate cultivation base of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Qijia HanDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhu AiDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Minyi WuDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Kun MaCT Imaging Research Center, GE HealthCare China, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiming XiangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China. xiangzhiming@pyhospital.com.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2037-6446

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. 82171931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the performance of a body mass index (BMI)-based sub-milliSievert low-dose CT (LDCT) protocol with multiple reconstruction algorithms for image quality and lung nodule assessment. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective study included 214 participants who underwent standard-dose CT (SDCT, 3.68 ± 1.53 mSv) reconstructed with 50% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V-50%) and LDCT. LDCT was randomly divided into a higher-dose group (LD-A, 0.57-1.15 mSv, n = 108) and a lower-dose group (LD-B, 0.33-0.63 mSv, n = 106). Each group was stratified into four BMI-based subgroups with individualized protocols reconstructed with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR-H and DLIR-M), ASIR-V-50%, and filtered back projection (FBP). Image quality, nodule detection across BMI subgroups, and the performance of four algorithms in detection, size measurement accuracy, and Lung-RADS v2022 consistency were analyzed.

resultsIn LDCT, DLIR-H provided superior image quality (p < 0.001) and the highest overall nodule detection rate (99.04%), surpassing ASIR-V-50% (98.55%) and FBP (97.87%) (both p < 0.05). The advantage was most evident for nodules < 6 mm, while all nodules ≥ 6 mm were consistently detected across algorithms. Detection rates showed no significant variation among BMI subgroups (all p > 0.05). For measurement accuracy, FBP and ASIR-V-50% performed better in LD-A (all p < 0.05), whereas DLIR-M was superior in LD-B (p < 0.001). All algorithms demonstrated excellent Lung-RADS agreement (κ > 0.9, p < 0.001).

conclusionA BMI-based sub-milliSievert LDCT protocol significantly reduced radiation exposure while maintaining nodule detection across BMI subgroups, with DLIR offering superior image quality and diagnostic performance. KEY POINTS: Question Evidence remains scarce on BMI-based sub-milliSievert low-dose CT using different reconstruction algorithms, regarding image quality and nodules detection (particularly < 6 mm). Findings BMI-based sub-milliSievert low-dose CT ensured balanced detectability across populations, while deep learning reconstruction improved image quality and achieved excellent sensitivity for lung nodule detection. Clinical relevance Deep learning reconstruction enhanced BMI-based sub-milliSievert low-dose CT, supporting its application in personalized sub-milliSievert low-dose lung cancer screening.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexLung NeoplasmsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSolitary Pulmonary NoduleTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAlgorithmsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiation DosageBody mass indexComputed tomographyDeep learningLung cancerLung nodule

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.