ArticleScientific reports2026
High-capacity removal of crystal violet using ZIF-8/graphene quantum dot composite with RSM optimization and explainable machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimization of greywater treatment using UiO-66 nanomaterial: artificial neural network modeling.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Synthetic dyes are persistent pollutants resistant to conventional treatment, necessitating effective removal strategies. This study examines the adsorption of Crystal Violet (CV) onto a ZIF-8/graphene quantum dot (Z8GD) composite under varying conditions. Batch experiments revealed strong sensitivity to operational parameters, with capacities ranging from 76 to 971 mg/g. Adsorption capacity increased from 195 to 460 mg/g as the dose decreased (0.10 → 0.04 g/L), from 200 to 401 mg/g with higher CV concentration (25 → 75 ppm), and from 162 to 971 mg/g with longer shaking time (3 → 24 h). Response Surface Methodology identified these factors as highly significant (p < 0.0001) and yielded a robust predictive model (R² = 0.9869). Kinetic analysis showed that the Avrami model (R² = 0.9993) best described the process, suggesting multi-mechanistic uptake. The maximum adsorption capacity reached ~ 7162 mg/g, with the Redlich–Peterson isotherm providing the best fit (R² = 0.9969). Thermodynamic analysis indicated an endothermic process (ΔH = 20.9 kJ/mol), with Gibbs free energy becoming more negative at higher temperatures (ΔG = − 30.6 to − 33.9 kJ/mol). Post-adsorption XRD and FTIR confirmed Z8GD’s structural stability and revealed multiple interactions, including π–π/CH–π stacking, hydrogen bonding, and electrostatic attraction. Machine learning models further enhanced predictive capability, with the SVR + XGB hybrid achieving the highest accuracy (R² = 0.9986). Shapley Additive Explanations identified shaking time and initial dye concentration as the most influential variables. Overall, Z8GD demonstrated exceptional adsorption capacity and mechanistic versatility, while the integration of RSM and ML provided both optimization and interpretability for adsorption behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.