SynthesisScientific reports2026
Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive therapies for plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Biologic Injections in Sports Medicine.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
- Fascia as a Functional System in Health and Disease: From Fundamental Biology to Assessment and Targeted Interventions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plantar fasciitis is a common and often disabling condition that affects both general and athletic populations, with chronic cases significantly impairing function and quality of life. Although a wide range of conservative and non-invasive, and minimally invasive treatments are available, the absence of direct comparative evidence has limited clarity about which interventions offer the most durable benefits. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 63 randomized controlled trials including 4170 participants to evaluate extracorporeal shock wave therapy, prolotherapy, and injection-based therapies including platelet-rich plasma, botulinum toxin A, corticosteroids, autologous blood, and local anaesthetics. Across short-, mid-, and long-term follow- up, botulinum toxin A provided the greatest short-term improvements in pain and plantar fascia thickness, where prolotherapy was most effective for sustained pain relief. Corticosteroids injection yielded the largest short-term function gains, while platelet-rich plasma supported the long-term improvements in both function and plantar fascia thickness. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy demonstrated broad efficacy across all domains and timepoints. These findings provide updated comparative evidence to guide clinical decision-making, suggesting that treatment strategies for plantar fasciitis should be tailored to symptom duration and therapeutic goals rather than defaulting to one intervention alone. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD420250641285.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.