Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41691062›Full record

ArticleCommunications chemistry2026

Mechanistic study on the sulfate migration in glycosaminoglycans during MS fragmentation.

Lukasz Polewski, Murat Yaman, Matko Tokić, Mateusz Marianski, Kevin Pagel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lukasz Polewski *Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9802-2528
Murat Yaman *Department of Chemistry, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6563-1434
Matko TokićInstitute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Mateusz MarianskiDepartment of Chemistry, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA. mmarians@hunter.cuny.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6566-9931
Kevin PagelInstitute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany. kevin.pagel@fu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8054-4718

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 372486779-CRC1340EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 899687-HS-SEQ
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glycosaminoglycans use positional sulfation to encode binding specificity onto its sequence. Understanding these sulfation patterns constitute a major challenge. Previous studies hinted that sulfate groups can migrate along glycans during collision-induced dissociation in mass spectrometry (MS) experiments, forming isomeric fragments that can lead to incorrect structural assignments. We use ion-mobility - mass spectrometry to investigate the mechanism of this phenomenon in heparin sulfate disaccharides. The sulfate group migrates from the non-reducing to reducing end of the sugar, and the degree of migration does not depend on the structure of the label. The migration product has a sulfate group attached to either 6O- or 3O-position of GlcNAc, and the migration mechanism consists of multiple steps, with the sulfate group first shifting from the iduronic acid to the 6O-position of GlcNAc, and next to the 3O-position. The presented data offer insight into the complexity and unpredictability of sulfated sugar fragmentation in tandem MS and extensive investigations is required to determine whether this represents a singular case or a general phenomenon characteristic of deprotonated sulfated glycans.

Identifiers

PMID41691062
PMCPMC13018550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.