ArticleScientific reports2026
Effects of micro-landscapes on attention restoration in older adults within community public spaces.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urban green spaces provide nature-like psychological restorative benefits. However, limited by mobility constraints and spatial accessibility, older adults struggle to fully utilize the restorative effects of large-scale landscapes. As an intensive landscape carrier, whether micro-landscapes can achieve nature-like psychological restorative benefits still requires empirical verification. Using eye-tracking combined with the Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS), this study adopted a repeated-measures ANOVA design, with different types of community public spaces (Nodal spaces/Path spaces/District spaces) and the presence/absence of micro-landscapes as independent variables, to explore the effects of micro-landscapes on attention restoration of older adults in community public spaces. The results showed that micro-landscapes significantly induced psychophysiological restoration effects similar to those of natural environments, with particularly significant performance in the Fascination dimension. Different types of community public spaces also had a significant impact on eye movement-related indices and interacted with micro-landscapes, among which micro-landscapes showed the best attention restoration benefits in “District spaces”. Considering the impact of micro-landscapes and community public spaces on the psychophysiological health of older adults, this finding may provide new protection and planning strategies for urban greening therapeutic design and the field of age-friendly community spaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.