Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41691056›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Effects of micro-landscapes on attention restoration in older adults within community public spaces.

Li Kun, Cao Haonan, Yu Liwen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Li KunDepartment of Art and Design, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Cao HaonanDepartment of Art and Design, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Yu LiwenDepartment of Art and Design, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China. yulw@gzhu.edu.cn.

Funding

2024 Ministry of Education Planning Fund for Humanities and Social Sciences Research 24YJAZH063Ministry of Education Industry-University Cooperation and Collaborative Education Project 231106195205856The 2024 Funding Program of Liwan Research Institute, Guangzhou University LWYJ202415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban green spaces provide nature-like psychological restorative benefits. However, limited by mobility constraints and spatial accessibility, older adults struggle to fully utilize the restorative effects of large-scale landscapes. As an intensive landscape carrier, whether micro-landscapes can achieve nature-like psychological restorative benefits still requires empirical verification. Using eye-tracking combined with the Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS), this study adopted a repeated-measures ANOVA design, with different types of community public spaces (Nodal spaces/Path spaces/District spaces) and the presence/absence of micro-landscapes as independent variables, to explore the effects of micro-landscapes on attention restoration of older adults in community public spaces. The results showed that micro-landscapes significantly induced psychophysiological restoration effects similar to those of natural environments, with particularly significant performance in the Fascination dimension. Different types of community public spaces also had a significant impact on eye movement-related indices and interacted with micro-landscapes, among which micro-landscapes showed the best attention restoration benefits in “District spaces”. Considering the impact of micro-landscapes and community public spaces on the psychophysiological health of older adults, this finding may provide new protection and planning strategies for urban greening therapeutic design and the field of age-friendly community spaces.

Indexed as

AttentionEnvironment DesignAgedEye MovementsEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHumansMaleAge-friendly designAttention restorationBonsaiCommunity public spacesEye-trackingMicro-landscapes

Identifiers

PMID41691056
PMCPMC12993072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.