ArticleScientific reports2026
Comprehensive safety evaluation for back-filling control system based on modified set pair matter-element extension model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To further enriching the safety system evaluation theory and comprehensively evaluate an control system for back-filling. This paper constructed a set pair matter-element extension comprehensive evaluation model based on the whole process theory, a multi-level comprehensive safety evaluation index system for back-filling control system. The index system was constructed by selecting 16 influencing factors from four aspects: slurry preparation system, pipeline monitoring system, strength monitoring system, and system visual management. Weights of the indicators are calculated by order relationship method, entropy weight method, and Lagrange combination weighting method. According to the set pair matter element extension calculation principle, a single indicator connection membership function is constructed. By calculating the single indicator connection membership degree and the comprehensive connection membership degree, the level of the control system for back-filling is comprehensively analyzed using the maximum membership degree as the criterion; Finally, taking three mines as examples, the blind number theory was introduced to determine the indicator assignment, and a comprehensive safety evaluation of the system level was conducted. The evaluation results were compared with cloud model and attribute recognition model. The results show that the evaluation results of the three models are consistent and consistent with the actual situation, indicating that the comprehensive evaluation model based on combination weighting method and set-pair extension matter element is applicable in the evaluation of control system for back-filling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.