Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41691034›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Faecal sac energy in common swifts (Apus apus) as a function of mass and nest identity.

Amnon Hahn, Jakub Z Kosicki, Reuven Yosef

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amnon HahnFriends of the Swifts, 39 Sde Boker St, Givatayim, 5346559, Israel.
Jakub Z KosickiDepartment of Avian Biology and Ecology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań Uniwersytetu poznańskiego str. 6, Poznań, 61 - 614, Poland. kubako@amu.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9044-7775
Reuven YosefBen Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 272, Eilat, 88106, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4331-9866

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nest sanitation is thought to be an important component of reproductive success because it can reduce pathogen loads and ectoparasites in the nest. Coprophagy - the ingestion of faeces - includes consumption of nestling faecal sacs by adults (allocoprophagy) and is therefore often discussed in the context of sanitation. In several bird taxa, this behaviour has also been linked to the "parental nutrition hypothesis", whereby adults may recover part of the energetic and nutritional costs of provisioning. In the Common Swift (Apus apus), faecal sac ingestion has been documented, yet the energetic content of faecal sacs has rarely been quantified directly, limiting evaluation of potential energetic recycling. Here we quantify the energy content of nestling faecal sacs using bomb calorimetry and test how gross energy relates to sac mass while describing among-nest variation. We collected 224 faecal sacs from nine nests in central Israel after fledging and measured gross energy and (desiccated) mass of each sample. Mean gross energy was 1.94 kJ per sac, with substantial variation among nests. In a mixed-effects model, gross energy increased with sac mass, and sacs from the same nest were more similar in energy content to each other than to sacs from other nests. Because samples were collected post-fledging and we did not measure ingestion frequency or assimilation efficiency, our results quantify the gross energetic substrate potentially available for recycling, but do not by themselves demonstrate a net energetic benefit of coprophagy. We outline the need for studies linking faecal-sac energy to nestling age, provisioning dynamics, and adult energy budgets to evaluate ecological payoffs and potential selection on this behaviour.

Indexed as

BirdsEnergy MetabolismFecesNesting BehaviorAnimalsAvian energeticCalorimetryCommon swift (Apus apus)CoprophagyFaecal sacs

Identifiers

PMID41691034
PMCPMC12992806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.