ArticleScientific reports2026
Investigation of water softening using ceramic adsorbents in a continuous adsorption process.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ceramic adsorbents offer a sustainable and cost-effective approach to water treatment, particularly for reducing water hardness. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of natural zeolite and activated alumina, modified with NaNO₃ and H₂SO₄ respectively, in a continuous fixed-bed column system for water softening. Adsorption experiments were conducted under varying operational conditions, including column diameters (1 and 1.5 cm), flow rates (10 and 20 mL/min), and an operation time of 600 min. The optimal setup, 1.5 cm column diameter and 10 mL/min flow rate, yielded bed saturation times of 600 min for modified zeolite and 570 min for modified alumina. NaNO₃-modified zeolite achieved removal efficiencies of 99.23% for total hardness, 99.37% for calcium, and 99.17% for magnesium. Breakthrough and saturation times indicated superior performance compared to unmodified adsorbents. Kinetic models, including Thomas, Adams–Bohart, and Yoon–Nelson, were applied, with the Thomas and Yoon–Nelson models fitting best (R² ≈ 0.98). The findings demonstrate that surface modification enhances the adsorption capacity of ceramic materials, highlighting their potential for efficient and scalable water hardness treatment in continuous systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.