ArticleScientific reports2026
Structural brain analysis in focal upper limb dystonia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prior structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies that investigated structural alterations in focal dystonia have reported inconsistent findings, potentially due to methodological limitations or sample heterogeneity. This work investigates gray and white matter changes in patients with upper limb dystonia using T1-weighted images and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Imaging data collected with MRI at 3T from 28 right-handed individuals with right upper limb dystonia and 29 healthy controls were analyzed. T1-weighted images were analyzed using FreeSurfer to examine cortical thickness, volume and area. DTI data were assessed using tract-based spatial statistics, regions of interest (ROI) analysis and probabilistic tractography. ROI included the basal ganglia, thalamus and cerebellum. Between-group differences were tested using permutation-based statistics. Whole-brain vertex-wise analyses revealed no significant differences in cortical morphology between groups. Tract and ROI-based analyses showed no changes in DTI metrics. These findings indicate preserved gray and white matter microstructural integrity in individuals with focal upper limb dystonia compared to controls, although finer abnormalities might still become evident using higher-resolution imaging methods. The absence of significant findings suggests potential for neuromodulation therapies and network-based approaches in this condition. Larger, multi-modal studies are warranted to further characterize anatomical substrates in focal dystonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.