Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41690991›Full record

ReviewNPJ vaccines2026

From promise to pitfalls: immunological lessons from dengue vaccines and their implications.

Cassia F Estofolete, Marielena V Saivish, Maurício L Nogueira, Nikos Vasilakis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cassia F Estofolete *Laboratório de Pesquisas em Virologia, Departamento de Doenças Dermatológicas, Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil.
Marielena V Saivish *Laboratório de Pesquisas em Virologia, Departamento de Doenças Dermatológicas, Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil.
Maurício L NogueiraLaboratório de Pesquisas em Virologia, Departamento de Doenças Dermatológicas, Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil. mauricio.nogueira@edu.famerp.br.
Nikos VasilakisDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA. nivasila@utmb.edu.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 465425/2014-3 and 405786/2022-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2013/21719-3 and 2022/03645-1Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2020/12875-5 and 2023/09590-7Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2022/09229-0National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases U01AI151807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue continues to pose a significant global health threat. However, the development of a safe and effective tetravalent vaccine is impeded by complex serotype-specific and cross-reactive immune responses. This review assesses licensed and advanced dengue vaccines, emphasizing serostatus-dependent safety, serotype imbalance, and the durability of protection. It also critically evaluates immunological correlates of protection and addresses remaining obstacles, such as vector-mediated immune modulation and orthoflavivirus cross-reactivity, to guide future dengue vaccine strategies.

Identifiers

PMID41690991
PMCPMC13018645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.