Observational studyBritish journal of anaesthesia2026
Associations of baseline characteristics, patient-reported outcomes, and satisfaction with pain therapy with the patient's global impression of change: a prospective cohort study.
Observational study in British journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03834922 (PROMPT Providing Standardized Consented PROMs), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
PROMPT Providing Standardized Consented PROMs (Patient Reported Outcome Measures) for Improving Pain Treatment A Multicenter, Non-interventional, Prospective Observational Study
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A ROS-responsive nanoplatform for synergistic pain relief and gastrointestinal recovery in intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Intravenous Sedation-Analgesia versus Local Anesthesia for Patient Comfort and Pain Control During Interventional Procedures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are key elements of assessing the efficacy of perioperative pain management. Here, we aimed to capture the association of 10 individually reported aspects of patient's specific impression of change since surgery (PSIC) related to four outcome domains of a previously defined core outcome set, relative to the patient's global impression of change (PGIC). We further evaluated the influence of type of surgery, sex, preoperative baseline characteristics, and satisfaction with pain management on PGIC.
methodsThis exploratory analysis used the PROMPT NIT-1 study data (2661 patients, 18 sites, four surgery types: total knee arthroplasty, sternotomy, breast cancer surgery, or endometriosis surgery). Male and female adults were included. All PROMs were assessed on postoperative day 3. We used ordinal regression models with PGIC as a dependent variable and PSICs as independent variables.
resultsThe overall model achieved a pseudo-R
conclusionsAlthough all four domains contributed to PGIC after surgery, pain intensity was the most important. These findings highlight the importance of both managing postoperative pain and optimising patient experience by addressing self-efficacy, adverse events, and pain-related interference of physical functioning. CLINICAL
trial registrationNCT03834922.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.