Trial reportChest2026
Three-Year Outcomes of Proximal Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation in OSA.
Trial report in Chest, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02263859 (ImThera Medical Targeted Hypoglossal Neurostimulation Study #3), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ImThera Medical Targeted Hypoglossal Neurostimulation Study #3
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proximal Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in the OSPREY Study : A Randomized Controlled Trial.Annals of internal medicine · 2026Trial
- Redefining Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Treatment in the Modern Era.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTargeted proximal hypoglossal nerve stimulation was shown to improve sleep-disordered breathing, sleep architecture, and quality of life (QOL) with a favorable safety profile over 1 year in the Targeted Hypoglossal Stimulation 3 (THN3) randomized controlled trial. Herein, THN3 proximal hypoglossal nerve stimulation (pHGNS) 3-year safety and efficacy are profiled with reference to distal hypoglossal nerve stimulation (dHGNS) from the Stimulation Therapy for Apnea Reduction (STAR) trial. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the long-term safety and efficacy of pHGNS, and how do they compare with dHGNS? STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsTHN3 (NCT02263859) enrollees had an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) 20-65/hr and BMI ≤ 35 kg/m
resultsOne hundred four of 138 (75%) THN3 participants completed 3-year follow-up. pHGNS delivered sustained improvements in sleep-disordered breathing, oxygenation, and QOL at months 24 and 36 vs baseline. Long-term outcomes were comparable to those at 11 months of treatment: median AHI reductions were -15.1/h (95% CI, -18.6, -12.6) and -17.7/h (-21.9, -15.3) with large effect sizes; probabilities of superiority vs baseline were 0.79 (0.72-.87) and 0.79 (0.70-.87), respectively. Benefits in sleep-disordered breathing and QOL were sustained at 36 months and appeared to be comparable to those reported for dHGNS at 3 years.
interpretationTherapeutic responses to pHGNS at 1 year were maintained through 3 years with relatively few adverse events. Similarities in responses to dHGNS suggest that pHGNS provides safe and efficacious long-term OSA treatment. CLINICAL
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02263859; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.