ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2026
Neural specialization of print processing in second language learning: A longitudinal ERP study of Chinese children learning English.
Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The N1 component of event-related potentials (ERP) reflects print tuning and lexicality effects. Previous studies have shown that for a second learned writing system, tuning and lexical effects are associated with age and ability. However, the developmental trajectory of these tuning and lexicality effects, and how language skills influence them, remains unclear. The present study investigated how English reading abilities contribute to longitudinal changes in N1 amplitude and print tuning among Chinese children in Hong Kong. Forty-three children performed a repetition detection task while EEG was recorded to examine three types of tuning: coarse tuning (real word versus false font symbol), fine tuning (real word versus nonword), and lexicality effect (real word versus pseudoword). Children's English word reading accuracy (EWR) was assessed. Results revealed significant coarse tuning and lexicality effects but no significant fine tuning effect. Only coarse tuning showed longitudinal change, with the coarse tuning effect decreasing over time. Furthermore, the N1 coarse tuning effect increased with EWR in the first assessment but decreased with EWR in the second assessment. This modulation was not found for fine tuning or lexicality effects. These findings support the visual perceptual expertise account in the second language (L2) context, demonstrating that the coarse tuning effect, but not fine tuning and lexicality effects, undergoes developmental changes that are modulated by reading skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.