Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41689885›Full record

ArticleJACC. Advances2026

Outcomes After Repeat Alcohol Septal Ablation in Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Takashi Hiruma, Mitsunobu Kitamura, Itaru Takamisawa, Ryo Abe, Tosei Kawai, Takashi Funaki, Yuki Izumi, Ryosuke Higuchi, Junya Matsuda, Yukichi Tokita and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Takashi HirumaDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan; Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsunobu KitamuraDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan; Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: mitsunobu.kitamura123@gmail.com.
Itaru TakamisawaDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan; Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryo AbeDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan; Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tosei KawaiDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan; Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi FunakiDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan; Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuki IzumiDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan; Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryosuke HiguchiDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Junya MatsudaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukichi TokitaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Mamoru NanasatoDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuo IguchiDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohiro IwakuraHypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoki ShimokawaHypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Shuichiro TakanashiHypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kawasaki Saiwai Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroo TakayamaDivision of Cardiac, Vascular & Thoracic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Yuichi J ShimadaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Hitoshi TakanoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Kuniya AsaiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsuaki IsobeSakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Morimasa TakayamaDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan; Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlcohol septal ablation (ASA) may necessitate a repeat procedure if the obstructive myocardium is not sufficiently ablated; however, the outcomes after repeat ASA are not well studied.

objectivesThe objective of the study was to evaluate outcomes in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy after repeat ASA.

methodsOf the 663 patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who underwent ASA, 84 with repeat ASA were analyzed. Residual left ventricular (LV) obstruction was stratified according to proximal or distal obstruction. The primary outcome was the absence of symptomatic residual LV obstruction, defined as NYHA functional class I or LV gradient <50 mm Hg, or both at 12 months after repeat ASA. Factors associated with the primary outcome were assessed using logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular mortality, fatal arrhythmia, heart failure hospitalization, and 3rd intervention.

resultsOf the 84 patients, 41 had proximal and 43 had distal obstruction. Five patients failed to achieve technical success. One patient with proximal obstruction died due to infection during the index hospitalization. At 12 months after repeat ASA, 80.7% (67/83) achieved the primary endpoint: 90.0% (36/40) with proximal obstruction and 72.1% (31/43) with distal obstruction. The primary outcome was associated with proximal obstruction (adjusted OR: 4.06; 95% CI: 1.09-18.3). During a median follow-up of 7.1 years, there were 13 deaths (15.5%). Cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization were similar between those with proximal or distal obstruction, whereas fatal arrhythmia and 3rd interventions were more frequent in distal obstruction.

conclusionsThe site of residual obstruction may be important for understanding long-term outcomes after repeat ASA, but this requires further studies.

Indexed as

alcohol septal ablationhypertrophic cardiomyopathyleft ventricular obstructionrepeat procedureseptal reduction therapy

Identifiers

PMID41689885
PMCPMC12925452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.