ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Impact of Primary Care Visit Frequency on Non-Urgent Emergency Department Visits in a Large Urban Medical Center.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo examine whether primary care visit frequency (PVF) is associated with non-urgent emergency department visits (NU-EDVs) at a large urban medical center, and to identify determinants of higher PVF among Emergency Department patients.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of adult ED patients (ESI ≥4 considered NU-EDV) at a Southern California Level I trauma center (September 2021-April 2024). Undergraduate research associates administered a 29-item instrument capturing demographics, utilization, barriers, trust in primary care, and comorbidities. Bivariate tests and multivariable logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for NU-EDV and for PVF ≥3 visits/year.
resultsAmong 964 patients with a primary care provider, 62.9% reported <3 PCP visits/year; 59.2% presented with NU-EDV. After adjustment, PVF ≥3/year was associated with lower odds of NU-EDV (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.87). Medicaid/Cal insurance was associated with higher odds of NU-EDV versus private insurance (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.12-2.08). Determinants of PVF ≥3/year included female sex (aOR 1.39, 95% CI 1.04-1.86), older age (aOR 1.01 per year, 95% CI 1.00-1.02), Black race (aOR 2.21, 95% CI 1.17-4.19), Medicaid/Cal coverage (aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.22-2.37), more chronic conditions (aOR 1.53 per condition, 95% CI 1.35-1.71), and lower odds with PCP distrust (aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.30-0.96).
conclusionsGreater primary care engagement is independently associated with fewer NU-EDVs; however, Medicaid beneficiaries remain at elevated risk for non-urgent ED use. Improving after-hours access, care coordination, and Medicaid-eligible unscheduled primary care may further reduce avoidable ED utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.