ArticlePsycho-oncology2026
Health Care Use > 2 Years After Cancer Diagnosis: Results From a Survey Among 5,710 Patients With Various Cancer Types.
Article in Psycho-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to examine health care use in a cross-sectional sample of Dutch cancer survivors > 2 years post-diagnosis.
methodsThe Dutch Federation of Cancer Patient Organizations (NFK), together with patient representatives and researchers, developed a cross-sectional online survey on life after cancer, which was distributed via email, websites, and social media.
resultsThe study included 5710 respondents (> 2 years post-diagnosis). Among those who reported long-term cancer/treatment-related consequences (approximately 89% of participants), one-third (33%) had received professional care or support for these issues in the past 3 months. Those reporting more cancer- or treatment related consequences, those diagnosed 2-5 years ago, those (probably) not (getting) better, and those currently under treatment were more likely to receive professional care or support. Care was primarily provided by medical specialists (47%), physical therapists (37%), and/or general practitioners (32%). 15% expressed a desire for care or support that they did not receive, indicating reasons such as a long time since diagnosis or affordability. Overall, 68% knew where to turn for help; among those with consequences, 19% received peer/volunteer support and 10% wanted it but did not receive it.
conclusionA significant proportion of long-term cancer survivors in our sample reported unmet support needs (15% for professional care, 10% for peer support). Efforts should focus on improving access to affordable professional care, expanding peer support networks, providing personalized long-term follow-up care, and reducing stigma around seeking help, particularly within the context of the Dutch healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.