Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41689733›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2026

Meta-analysis of treatment-emergent seizures in glioma vaccine trials.

Louise Mc Carthy, Brian M Andersen, Patrick Y Wen, David A Reardon, Steven Tobochnik

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Louise Mc CarthyDepartment of Neurology, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Brian M AndersenDepartment of Neurology, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Patrick Y WenCenter for Neuro-Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
David A ReardonCenter for Neuro-Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Steven TobochnikDepartment of Neurology, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA. Steven.Tobochnik@va.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9071-8398

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEpilepsy is commonly associated with gliomas, with glioma-neuron hyperexcitable interactions promoting tumor growth. Glioma vaccines are a promising form of immunotherapy, however immune-mediated effects on hyperexcitability are poorly understood. Seizures induce a proinflammatory state, whereas gliomas manipulate the microenvironment to evade adaptive immunity. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the incidence of seizures after glioma vaccine therapy as a clinical marker of peritumoral hyperexcitability.

methodsStudies were identified by query of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases with filtering for clinical trials and review of references. Inclusion criteria were prospective trials of cancer vaccines in patients with histologically confirmed diffuse glioma. Studies were excluded if seizure incidence was not reported or if data for all adverse events (AEs) regardless of treatment attribution was unavailable. Serious AEs were defined as grade 3 or higher by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events when available. Seizure incidence was calculated by pooled proportions with random effects using a generalized linear mixed model. Binary outcome meta-analysis of controlled trials was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method with random effects.

resultsAfter applying pre-screening exclusion criteria, there were 125 studies screened for seizure-related AEs, and 53 studies with 2002 vaccine-treated patients were included in the final analysis. Treatment-emergent seizures of any grade occurred in 19.3% of patients (95% CI: 16.7–22.2%). Serious seizure AEs occurred in 4.3% (95% CI: 2.9–6.4%). In controlled trials, seizure rates of any grade were similar between vaccine and control groups (RR 1.20, 95% CI: 0.89–1.62, I2 = 8.5%), as well as for serious seizure AEs (RR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.65–1.73, I2 = 0%). There were no differences observed in seizure risk between dendritic cell, tumor cell, and peptide vaccines (p = 0.67).

conclusionSeizure-related data were not available for most glioma vaccine trials, likely due to lack of attribution to vaccine treatment. Using AE reporting, approximately 19% of patients had seizures during vaccine therapy and trial monitoring. In controlled trials, there was moderate certainty of similar seizure risk associated with vaccine versus control treatment. Integrating standardized detailed seizure tracking into future glioma trials may improve response assessments.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCancer VaccinesGliomaImmunotherapySeizuresClinical Trials as TopicHumansCancer VaccinesCancerEpilepsyGlioblastomaImmunotherapyInflammationSeizureVaccine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.