ArticleGeroScience2026
Differences across males and females in cognitive aging and mortality risk: a trajectory-based approach.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined hypothesized differences across males and females in the relationship between cognitive trajectories and mortality in older adults. Data were drawn from the ZARADEMP study on dementia and depression in adults aged 55 and older in Zaragoza, Spain. A total of 2403 cognitively healthy individuals who completed at least three of four waves over a 12-year follow-up were included. Cognitive trajectories were derived from Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Using growth mixture modeling (GMM), four trajectories in men and three in women were previously identified. Mortality data, obtained from official records, covered up to 6 years after the final wave. Cox proportional hazards models assessed mortality risk across trajectories, adjusting for sociodemographic, medical, and lifestyle factors. Mortality was higher among participants with steeper cognitive decline in both sexes. In men, those in the declining-low and stable-medium trajectories had 133% and 36% higher mortality risk, respectively, compared to the stable-high group. In women, declining-low and stable-medium classes had 133% and 30% increased risk, respectively. The association in women followed a clear gradient; in men, this pattern was absent. Differences in mortality predictors were identified: medical conditions (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, alcohol use) were significant only in men, whereas psychosocial and functional variables (e.g., anxiety, ADL dependency, marital status) were significant only in women. This is the first report showing differences across males and females in the association between cognitive decline trajectories and mortality. Sex-specific strategies may be needed to mitigate mortality associated with trajectories of cognitive decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.