ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2026
Quantifying hepatic arterial blood flow with 4D flow MRI: an in vivo feasibility and repeatability study.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the feasibility and repeatability of four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI for quantifying hepatic arterial blood flow (HABF) in healthy volunteers and patients with liver disease, and to identify sources of measurement variability. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this prospective single-centre study, 23 healthy volunteers and 12 patients underwent two-dimensional (2D) and 4D flow acquisitions at 3T. Time-averaged and peak systolic vessel areas, velocities, and flow rates of the common hepatic artery (CHA) were extracted. Feasibility of 4D flow was assessed via CHA visibility on phase-contrast MRA. Scan-rescan repeatability of 4D flow was assessed by calculating within-subject coefficient of variation (CV
resultsAverage 4D flow feasibility rate was 83%. CV DISCUSSION: 4D flow MRI enables HABF quantification, though substantial scan-rescan variability exists. Acquisition-related factors were the main source of within-subject variability, while plane positioning contributed less.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41689705What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.