ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2026
Anxiety in Williams Syndrome: Qualitative Analysis of Caregiver and Individual Interviews.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIndividuals with Williams syndrome (WS) are disproportionately affected by anxiety. However, gaps remain in our knowledge of the clinical presentation and impact of anxiety in this population. The objectives of this study were to (1) better understand the phenomenology and impact of anxiety in this population without the constraints of standardized mental health diagnostic criteria, and (2) compare caregiver and participants with WS report of anxiety.
methodsOne-hundred caregivers and 79 individuals with WS participated in open-ended, semi-structured interviews designed to learn more about the symptoms, content, and impact of anxiety on individuals with WS. The interviews were analyzed using a six-step thematic analysis approach. McNemar's test was performed to compare the frequency for which each code was reported by caregivers versus WS participants.
resultsThematic analysis revealed five main themes: (1) observable signs of anxiety, (2) anxiety content, (3) interference of anxiety, (4) caregiver accommodation, and (5) response to anxiety. Caregivers were more likely to report all codes than participants with WS, with the exception of physical signs of anxiety.
conclusionThis study provides a deeper understanding of common signs and symptoms of anxiety in individuals with WS, as well as the types of symptoms that are best ascertained through caregiver versus self-report.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41689698What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.