Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41689667›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental medicine2026

The safety and efficacy of bispecific T-cell engagers (TCEs) in patients with glioma.

Behrouz Robat-Jazi, Parsa Lorestani, Negar Nejati, Elaheh Ebrahimi, Mohammad Amin Habibi, Mahsa Ahmadpour, Armita Jokar-Derisi, Zahra Karimizadeh, Kamyar Bagheri, Sajjad Ahmadpour

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Behrouz Robat-JaziResearch Center for Chronic Inflammatory Diseases, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Parsa LorestaniStudents Research Committee, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Negar NejatiResearch assistant for pediatric Cell and Gene Therapy Research Centre, Gene, Cell & Tissue Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Elaheh EbrahimiPatient Safety Research Center, Clinical Research Institute, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
Mohammad Amin HabibiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mohammad.habibi1392@yahoo.com.
Mahsa AhmadpourDepartment of Internal Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Armita Jokar-DerisiStudent Research Committee, school of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Zahra KarimizadehPediatric Cell and Gene Therapy Research Centre, Gene, Cell & Tissue Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Kamyar BagheriAbadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran.
Sajjad AhmadpourPatient Safety Research Center, Clinical Research Institute, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran. sajjadahmadpour@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the most aggressive and resistant tumors of the central nervous system, glioblastoma (GBM) has a poor prognosis and few available treatments. Because of the tumor's infiltrative nature, immunosuppressive environment, and resistance mechanisms, traditional treatments such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery offer only modest survival benefits. Bispecific T-cell engagers (TCEs) have shown promising preclinical and early clinical results, and immunotherapy has become a feasible strategy. TCEs efficiently promote antigen evasion and strong tumor lysis by directing cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) to tumor-associated antigens (TAA) such as the EGFRvIII ligands IL-13Rα2, Fn14, and NKG2D ligands (NKG2DLs). Although phase I clinical studies with AMG 596 have shown acceptable safety profiles and early indications of efficacy, preclinical mice have demonstrated prolonged longevity. However, challenges still exist, including the short half-life of TCEs molecules, limited T-cell infiltration, antigen heterogeneity, and the risk of neurotoxicity or cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Promising developments include novel approaches such as multivalent targeting, DNA-encoded or cell-delivered TCEs, and combinations with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or CAR-T cells. With an emphasis on its integration into multimodal treatment approaches, this review highlights the safety, effectiveness, and potential uses of TCEs immunotherapy for gliomas.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificBrain NeoplasmsGliomaImmunotherapyT-LymphocytesAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmHumansT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, BispecificAntigens, NeoplasmBispecific t-cell engagersGlioblastomaGliomaImmunotherapyTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID41689667
PMCPMC12909356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.