ArticleAnimal cognition2026
Waiting for reward: preference for signalled delays increases with average wait time.
Article in Animal cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Waiting for reward: preference for signalled delays increases with average wait time.Animal cognition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When rewards occur after a delay, signals that the wait will be shorter than average can be valuable. A recent study by Macias et al. (2024) found that pigeons preferred an alternative providing signals for a short or long delay to food over an alternative that provided no signals about delay. Preference for the signalled alternative increased with increases in the ratio of the long to short delay, with the average delay held constant. Here we report a preregistered experiment that tested the effect of changing the average delay, with the ratio of long to short delays held constant. Pigeons preferred the signalled alternative, and this preference was higher at longer delays (20 s and 40 s) than shorter delays (2 s and 4 s). This finding is opposite to the predictions from the modified Delta-Sigma model proposed by Macias et al., but fits well with predictions of the Signal for Good News (SiGN) model, which assumes that signals for a reduction in delay to reward reinforce choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.