ReviewJournal of neurology2026
A roadmap for a patient-centred approach to Pompe disease management.
Review in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Defining the therapeutic corridor of stability in enzyme replacement therapy for Pompe disease: a position statement.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPompe disease is a rare, progressive genetic disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the GAA gene. Emerging gene therapies offer the potential for long-term disease management, although logistical and clinical challenges demand specialised centres with defined protocols. A scientific steering committee of 8 European experts deliberated on the requirements for establishing gene therapy centres of excellence for Pompe disease.
methodsA modified think-tank approach was used to develop expert-based recommendations through qualitative research utilizing expert opinion methodology. Discussion topics were validated in an online kick-off meeting. Experts were assigned specific topics and tasked with generating content. Multiple online meetings facilitated expert presentations, discussions, and validation of recommendations for each topic.
resultsOptimised patient management and timely access to treatment require accurate diagnosis and evaluation of Pompe disease. The committee recommended expanding newborn screening programs for infantile-onset Pompe disease and developing protocols for follow-up of presymptomatic late-onset Pompe disease. A specialised multidisciplinary team trained in Pompe disease and gene therapy should manage the patient journey. Pre-gene therapy assessments were recommended to mitigate risks. Patients should be hospitalized and continuously monitored during gene therapy infusions. After gene therapy, guidelines recommend corticosteroid immunosuppression, monitoring for adverse events (including hepatoxicity, myocarditis, thrombocytopenia, thrombotic microangiopathy, and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis), and Pompe disease assessments (including motor functional assessments, magnetic resonance imaging of the muscles, and patient-reported outcomes). Centres of excellence require infrastructure with standard operating procedures for gene therapy products.
conclusionsImplementing gene therapy for Pompe disease requires a coordinated multidisciplinary effort to overcome gaps in knowledge, infrastructure, and patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.