Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41689615›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2026

Management of Recurrent Dysphagia after POEM and Heller Myotomy: Current Strategies and Future Directions.

Ronald Casey Turner, Anh D Nguyen, Thomas Tielleman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ronald Casey TurnerDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Anh D NguyenDivision of Gastroenterology, Center for Esophageal Diseases, Center for Esophageal Research, Baylor University Medical Center, Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, TX, USA.
Thomas TiellemanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive & Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. Thomas.Tielleman@utsouthwestern.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDysphagia recurrence after myotomy for achalasia presents a complex clinical challenge. This review highlights causes of recurrent dysphagia, diagnostic strategies, and management options following laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) or per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). RECENT

findingsBoth POEM and LHM demonstrate durable efficacy, but recurrence arises from incomplete myotomy, blown-out myotomy (BOM), fundoplication-related obstruction, anatomic esophageal body abnormalities, esophageal dysmotility, or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In the diagnostic evaluation, functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) and high-resolution manometry (HRM) provide complementary assessments of esophageal and esophagogastric junction dynamics, while timed barium esophagram (TBE) and endoscopy detect structural issues. Redo myotomy (POEM or LHM), pneumatic dilation (PD), and emerging techniques, such as per-oral plication of the esophagus (POPE), offer targeted therapy with favorable safety and symptom improvement. Recurrent dysphagia is multifactorial, requiring comprehensive esophageal evaluation. Advanced diagnostics and minimally invasive interventions expand therapeutic options, particularly in end-stage disease.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersEsophageal AchalasiaHeller MyotomyMyotomyHumansLaparoscopyManometryPostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceEnd-stage achalasiaEsophagusHeller myotomyPOEMRecurrent dysphagia

Identifiers

PMID41689615
PMCPMC12906571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.