ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2026
Adolescent and Young Adult Leadership and Engagement in HIV Strategy and Policy Development: Experiences from the UNICEF/WHO/UNAIDS Blueprint Collaborative.
Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewAdolescents and young adults (AYA) face disproportionately worse outcomes along the HIV prevention and care continuum. Despite global commitments to AYA engagement, AYA remain underrepresented in research, programming, and policy development. We summarize recent innovations in AYA engagement within the HIV literature and reflect on the 2023 Blueprint Collaborative, a UNICEF/WHO/UNAIDS initiative where AYA (ages 10-30) shaped global adolescent HIV strategy. RECENT
findingsOur review found examples of AYA engagement across the intervention life cycle, including in shaping research agendas, designing interventions, and building AYA capacity for sustainability. For the Blueprint Collaborative, which featured a AYA-led evidence synthesis and global open call, we assessed AYA engagement using the RIGHTS framework. A major strength of the Blueprint Collaborative was the robust AYA engagement, moving beyond AYA consultations to AYA leadership. AYA shared decision-making authority with adults as researchers, organizers, and open call judges. Through a "learning by doing" approach, AYA gained skills in research and multidisciplinary collaboration. Blueprint results were presented to senior leadership, developed into strategy, and disseminated through publications and AYA networks. AYA leadership can provide several benefits for AYA research and programming, such as institutionalizing community engagement, improving research relevance, and advancing equity. AYA are eager and capable of driving HIV strategy and policy, but senior partners should step back to enable these opportunities. Senior partners might better serve to support AYA leadership in strategic planning to align programming with AYA priorities and build research and advocacy skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41689613What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.