Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41689608›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental medicine2026

Innovative combinatory approaches with dendritic cell-based vaccines: bridging preclinical insights and clinical challenges.

Jamal Motallebzadeh Khanmiri, Mohammad Khani-Eshratabadi, Fatemeh Seyedmoharrami, Mohammad Hossein Khazaee-Nasirabadi, Mehrad Dehdashti, Narjes Seddighi, Fatemeh Peymaninezhad, Alireza Khiabani, Alireza Khanahmad, Behzad Baradaran

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Vaccine Adjuvants and Delivery Systems: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jamal Motallebzadeh KhanmiriStudent Research Committee, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Mohammad Khani-EshratabadiDepartment of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh SeyedmoharramiDepartment of Hematology and Blood Banking, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mohammad Hossein Khazaee-NasirabadiDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran.
Mehrad DehdashtiStudent Research Committee, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Narjes SeddighiStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Fatemeh PeymaninezhadStudent Research Committee, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Alireza KhiabaniStudent Research Committee, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Alireza KhanahmadDepartment of Hematology and Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Allied Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Behzad BaradaranImmunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Daneshghah Ave, Tabriz, Iran. baradaranb@tbzmed.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8642-6795

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccines have emerged as a promising and innovative approach in the immunotherapy of both solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. Owing to their unique capacity to present antigens and activate tumor-specific T cell responses, DC vaccines play a pivotal role in counteracting tumor immune evasion. Despite significant advances in vaccine development, several challenges - including the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, the complexities of designing optimal vaccines, and the difficulty of translating preclinical successes into consistent clinical outcomes - have limited their widespread effectiveness. This review highlights recent combinatory strategies aimed at enhancing the design and application of DC-based vaccines. These include the incorporation of neoantigens, tumor lysates, mRNA platforms, DC-tumor fusion constructs, and combination therapies involving immune checkpoint inhibitors and CAR-T cells. Furthermore, we examine the translational barriers that hinder the clinical implementation of these approaches and explore future directions for improving efficacy, safety, and personalization of DC vaccines. DC-based vaccines may be more effectively positioned to yield substantial and durable clinical advantages in standard oncology practice when these combinatorial strategies are integrated with rational clinical trial design, biomarker-informed patient selection, and rigorous compliance with manufacturing and regulatory standards. Ultimately, individualized and multifaceted strategies are expected to hold the greatest promise for improving therapeutic outcomes while minimizing adverse effects.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesDendritic CellsImmunotherapyNeoplasmsAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmCombined Modality TherapyHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsTumor MicroenvironmentAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsCancer immunotherapyCombination immunotherapyDendritic cell vaccinesHematologic malignanciesImmune checkpoint inhibitorsNeoantigens

Identifiers

PMID41689608
PMCPMC12909375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.