Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41689494›Full record

ArticleResearch in nursing & health2026

Development and Validation of the Professional Self-Concept Scale for Hospital Nurses (PSCS-HN).

Eun-Ha Kim, Hye-Ah Yeom

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Research in nursing & health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eun-Ha KimCollege of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0009-0004-1187-4069
Hye-Ah YeomCollege of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4400-716X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Professional self-concept (PSC) has a positive influence on the attitudes and behaviors of members of an organization toward their work. Although establishing PSC is vital for nurses to provide quality nursing care, assessing PSC precisely in ever-changing healthcare environments can be challenging. This methodological study involved the development of a new instrument, the Professional Self-Concept Scale for Hospital Nurses (PSCS-HN) and evaluation of its validity and reliability. The scale development phase involved the development of preliminary items based on a literature review and focus group interviews, followed by primary and secondary content validation by an expert panel. In the scale evaluation phase, a survey of 440 nurses working in general hospitals was conducted to examine scale validity and reliability. Construct validity was evaluated through item, exploratory factor, and confirmatory factor analyses, which resulted in a final scale with five factors and 23 items. Concurrent and convergent validity of the PSCS-HN were confirmed by significant correlation coefficients of the scale with existing instruments. Regarding reliability, in this study, the Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's ω of the PSCS-HN were 0.93 and 0.95, respectively. The results confirm that the PSCS-HN is a valid and reliable scale to assess hospital nurses' PSC.

Indexed as

Nursing Staff, HospitalSelf ConceptAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesfactor analysis, statisticalNursing staff, hospitalself‐conceptsurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41689494
PMCPMC13123630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.