ArticleJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2026
Detecting Fibromuscular Dysplasia-Related Renal Artery Stenosis: CTA or Doppler US?
Article in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the diagnostic efficacy of Doppler ultrasound (DUS) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) in patients with renal artery fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD)-related severe renal artery stenosis (RAS).
methodsIn this retrospective study, 78 patients with hypertension were confirmed FMD-related severe RAS based on clinical and angiographical features. All participants underwent standardized renal DUS and CTA. Two blinded readers independently classified lesions and assessed hemodynamics, with discrepancies resolved by a third senior radiologist. Diagnostic performance of DUS and CTA was compared per segment and overall using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard.
resultsA total of 157 renal arteries were analyzed, 86 of which demonstrated severe stenosis accompanied with abnormal arteriographic features of FMD. Integrated analysis showed higher sensitivity for DUS versus CTA in detecting FMD-related severe stenoses (overall: 97.7% versus 67.4%, p < .001; main renal arteries: 98.5% versus 79.4%, p = .001; accessory/branch arteries: 94.4% versus 22.2%, Δ72.2%, p < .001). Both modalities achieved 100% specificity for accessory/branch lesions. DUS demonstrated 100% specificity for main artery lesions and overall, whereas CTA was 97.7% for main artery lesions and 97.2% overall.
conclusionDUS outperformed CTA for FMD-related severe RAS, especially with consistent accuracy across vascular territories, supporting its potential as a preferred imaging modality in FMD evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.