ArticleMuscle & nerve2026
Automated Segmentation of Median Nerve Cross-Sectional Area in Healthy Controls and Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using a Convolutional Neural Network.
Article in Muscle & nerve, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimsThe cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve (MN) is a key parameter for confirming carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) with ultrasound. This study evaluates the performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN) with a 2D U-Net architecture for automated MN CSA segmentation in both healthy individuals and patients with CTS. Automated segmentation supports large-scale analysis, improves standardization across centers, and may serve as a foundation for future diagnostic tools.
methodsThree hundred static ultrasound images from 50 healthy participants and 300 from 74 patients with CTS were used to train and validate a five-layer U-Net model. Each CSA measurement was performed in triplicate. Model performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and by comparing automated with manually annotated CSA values. Prospective evaluation was conducted on a small, unseen dataset and on data acquired using a different ultrasound system.
resultsManual CSA measurements showed excellent repeatability (ICC 0.982). The model achieved high DSCs (0.95 in controls, 0.96 in CTS) and showed no statistically significant difference from manual CSA measurements (p = 0.227). Segmentation inaccuracies in the test set were primarily attributable to minor contouring differences at the epineurial border. On unseen data, errors occurred in more proximally scanned images or scans showing intraneural hyperechogenicity. DISCUSSION: In line with current literature, a CNN with a 2D U-Net architecture demonstrates strong potential for MN segmentation on static ultrasound images. However, reduced accuracy on unseen data suggests overfitting. Further validation is required to ensure robustness across anatomical and technical variation before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.