ArticleAustralasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists2026
How do I remove my clinical glasses? A qualitative study with mental healthcare professionals about patient experience film.
Article in Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectivesGlobally, mental health disorders represent a significant public health challenge. There is growing interest in patient-centered care within psychiatric practice, emphasizing the need to understand patients' lived experiences. Films illustrating patient perspectives have been proposed as a means to foster empathy among mental health professionals. MethodsThis qualitative study investigates how mental health professionals experience patient experience films.Data Collection and AnalysisThis study uses reflexive thematic analysis of interviews and focus groups.. with 23 Dutch healthcare professionals (psychiatrists, nurses, general practitioners, and medical interns). ResultsThis study shows: (1) Patient-experience Films Aren't on Our Radar, (2) Our take on the film: from moved to mystified, (3) We See Big Value Here-Especially for Those Just Starting Out, and (4) Making It Work: Ideas and Obstacles for Using Films in Training. Patient-experience films are seen as potentially valuable for trainees, but institutional resistance presented significant barriers to integration. ConclusionSystemic and structural modifications are recommended to optimize film efficacy as training tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.