ArticleDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2026
Consensus-based follow-up and treatment registry for GNAO1-associated disorder.
Article in Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Consensus-based follow-up and treatment registry for GNAO1-associated disorder.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2026Article
- Outcome measurement in GNAO1-related disorder: Balancing global severity and domain-specific change.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo establish consensus-based recommendations on relevant domains of functioning and assessment instruments for an GNAO1-associated disorder follow-up and treatment registry.
methodThis was a mixed-methods study consisting of a systematic literature search, a survey, and a real-time Delphi procedure to achieve consensus on domains and instruments. A panel of experts, including health care professionals and individuals with lived experience, was involved in the survey and Delphi procedure. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) was used as a framework for the Delphi query.
resultsThe Delphi procedure consisted of 67 statements, including 19 on domains and 48 on instruments, identified from the survey and systematic search. The international panel consisted of 27 health care professionals and 10 parents. The panel recommended 17 ICF domains and 26 assessment instruments, mainly in the 'Body Structures & Functions' and 'Activities & Participation' components.
interpretationUsing consensus-based ICF domains and assessment instruments for a GNAO1 registry is a major step towards harmonization of future international registries, which will facilitate natural history studies and clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.