Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41689300›Full record

ArticleJournal of environmental quality

Evaluation of Alabama phosphorus index using edge-of-field monitoring data.

Anjan Bhatta, Rishi Prasad, Debolina Chakraborty, Dexter B Watts, Henry A Torbert, Peter Kleinman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of environmental quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anjan BhattaDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2836-4506
Rishi PrasadDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.
Debolina ChakrabortyDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.
Dexter B WattsUSDA-ARS National Soil Dynamics Lab, Auburn, Alabama, USA.
Henry A TorbertUSDA-ARS National Soil Dynamics Lab, Auburn, Alabama, USA.
Peter KleinmanUSDA-ARS-Soil Management and Sugarbeet Research Unit, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5093-3736

Funding

Alabama Agricultural Experiment StationHatch Program of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDAUSDA-ARS cooperative agreement 58-6010-4-001USDA-NRCS Conservation Innovation NR203A750013G016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phosphorus index (P-index) was developed to assess field vulnerability to phosphorus (P) loss and guide P management decisions. The original structure of the P-index was additive, and with continued refinement, multiplicative and component-based indices were developed. Alabama adopted the additive version in early 2000; however, the tool was never tested for its performance. The objectives of this study were to (i) evaluate the Alabama P-index using edge-of-field P loss data, (ii) test if multiplicative (Tennessee) and component-based (Georgia) P-indices perform better, and (iii) improve and test the performance of a modified Alabama P-index. We evaluated the performance by examining the strength and directional relationship between P-index scores and annual P loads. The Alabama P-index showed weak correlations (r < 0.50) between risk scores and measured dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP), total particulate phosphorus (TPP), and total phosphorus (TP) loads. Additionally, directional inaccuracies were observed, indicating that the index misclassified the relative risk of P loss. Further, we evaluated multiplicative and component-based indices but found similar discrepancies between predicted risk scores and actual P loading. Subsequently, we modified the Alabama P-index by replacing soil test P with the phosphorus saturation ratio and substituting the underground outlet system factor with the timing of P application. Minor adjustments to weighting factors were made. The modified P-index demonstrated statistically significant correlations (r > 0.51) and directional alignment with DRP, TPP, and TP loads, suggesting it can serve as a reliable interim tool for assessing P losses. Future research should focus on restructuring and validating a component-based P-index tailored to Alabama's agricultural systems.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringPhosphorusAlabamaPhosphorus

Identifiers

PMID41689300
PMCPMC12905517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.