ArticleMolecular ecology resources2026
Balancing Barcoding and Genomics: gDNA Quality in Insect Vouchers After HotSHOT DNA Extraction.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Megabarcoding and Metabarcoding to Unlock Diversity and Distribution Data Shortfalls in Dark Taxa.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Preserving Shell Integrity of Microgastropods With the Nondestructive HotSHOT DNA Extraction Method.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Accuracy of occurrence and abundance estimates from insect metabarcoding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Balancing Barcoding and Genomics: gDNA Quality in Insect Vouchers After HotSHOT DNA Extraction.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA extraction with an alkaline buffer system called 'HotSHOT' is widely used for barcoding because it is rapid, inexpensive, and voucher preserving, but it remains unclear whether sufficient genomic DNA (gDNA) remains in small vouchers for downstream use in genomics. We here evaluate gDNA quality and quantity before and after HotSHOT treatment of 11 insect families representing six orders. Some specimens were flash frozen immediately after collection, while others were kept for 1 week at tropical temperatures in ethanol to mimic Malaise trap conditions. Encouragingly, we show that gDNA of sufficiently high quality and quantity for genomic sequencing remained in specimens treated with HotSHOT. We also show that DNA integrity was strongly influenced by field storage, with specimens exposed to Malaise trap conditions showing such pronounced degradation that the standard HotSHOT treatment no longer significantly altered DNA quality. For control material, HotSHOT treatments involving longer exposure to high temperature led to smaller fragment lengths, with the effect apparently being influenced by the degree of specimen sclerotization. Our results thus suggest that optimised HotSHOT treatments, together with carefully controlled pre-extraction storage, preserve voucher gDNA of sufficient quality for downstream genomic analyses with both short-read and possibly even some long-read sequencing technologies. We provide protocol selection guidelines that improve voucher gDNA preservation in HotSHOT-treated samples. This is particularly important for many species which are only known from one or few specimens discovered during barcoding projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.