Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41689171›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2026

Making sense of activity-based workplaces: perspectives from staff in a municipal setting.

Erika Wall, Pär Löfstrand, Stig Vinberg, John Selander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erika WallDepartment of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1984-8063
Pär LöfstrandDepartment of Education, Psychology and Social work, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3320-5999
Stig VinbergDepartment of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5935-5688
John SelanderDepartment of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7074-5660

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study explores how leaders and employees make sense of working conditions in a recently introduced activity-based workplace (ABW) in a municipal setting in Sweden. The analysis draws on Weick (1995) concept of sensemaking.

methodsTranscripts from focus group interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis to examine how different staff groups experienced the transition from traditional cellular offices to ABW, and how these experiences framed their sense-making of ABW within the organisational context.

resultsThe analysis shows that ABW create working conditions marked by both increased interaction and persistent challenges related to privacy, confidentiality, noise, leadership, and ergonomics. Sensemaking was structured around five themes: Contrasting; Rationality; Collective process; Working from home; and Focusing on the ideal.

conclusionSensemaking of ABW is closely tied to how well concrete working conditions support core work tasks. Acceptance of ABW depends less on the concept itself and more on its ability to accommodate sector-specific demands, particularly confidentiality and focused work. The findings underscore the importance of aligning ABW design and implementation with everyday work practices in the public sector.

Indexed as

LeadershipWorking ConditionsWorkplaceAdultConfidentialityFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleOrganizational CulturePrivacyQualitative ResearchSwedenOccupational wellbeingorganisational changepsychosocial work environmentsense-makingworking conditions

Identifiers

PMID41689171
PMCPMC12912208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.