ArticleJournal of cannabis research2026
Expected population prevalence following decriminalization of recreational use of cannabis in Sweden.
Article in Journal of cannabis research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany countries and jurisdictions have recently adopted more lenient cannabis laws. While use remains prohibited in Sweden, this stance is debated due to high drug-related mortality. To inform this debate, we predicted changes in cannabis use following a hypothetical decriminalization in Sweden.
methodsJurisdiction-level data on self-reported cannabis use from 12 countries (across Europe and Australia) and four U.S. states were used in a multilevel meta-regression model to predict the most likely changes in past 12-month and past 30-day cannabis use following decriminalization in Sweden.
resultsWe predicted an immediate increase in the prevalence of both past 12-month and past 30-day cannabis use following decriminalization. However, the longer-term trends differed between these measures. For past 12-month use, the gap in prevalence between scenarios with and without decriminalization gradually narrowed over time. In contrast, for past 30-day use, the gap widened.
conclusionsDecriminalizing cannabis use in Sweden would lead to an initial increase of self-reported cannabis use. The extent to which this reflects a genuine increase in use or an increased propensity to disclose the behavior remains to be understood. After this initial increase experimental use tends to stabilize, while recurrent use may continue to increase, probably indicating an increasing pool of individuals transitioning towards dependence. The method we propose for predicting population trends in cannabis use following decriminalization can be easily replicated in other context and used to support evidence-based policy decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.