ArticleMolecular neurodegeneration2026
The functional role of glial cells in the pathologic brain as reviewed by Alois Alzheimer in 1910.
Article in Molecular neurodegeneration, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A network toxicology and machine learning approach to uncover the molecular machinery of bisphenol A-induced colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alois Alzheimer is known for the clinical diagnosis and neuropathological analysis of the neurodegenerative disease named after him. Yet, a less celebrated but equally fundamental contribution lies in his monograph, “Contributions to the knowledge of the pathologic neuroglia and their relationship to degenerative processes in the nervous tissue.” This work, now translated, meticulously details the dynamic role of glial cells in brain pathology, a paradigm-shifting concept for its time. Alzheimer applied then-novel staining techniques -including adaptations of Scharlach red and Mallory hematoxylin- to visualize lipids and protoplasmic degradation in post-mortem human brains. These approaches revealed striking changes in the glial network across disorders ranging from stroke and trauma to multiple sclerosis, syphilis-related dementia, various forms of neurodegeneration, and schizophrenia. He documented the appearance of two novel glial forms, which he termed “ameboid glia” and “glial granule cells”, involved in the phagocytosis of “fatty matter” and “lipoid substances” from degenerating nervous tissue. He also documented “neuronophagia,” where glial cells appeared to directly interact with and “dissolve” damaged neurons. This work laid the conceptual groundwork for modern neuroscience. We now recognize Alzheimer’s “ameboid glia” as the earliest documented observations of activated microglia and astrocytes, and his descriptions of glia’s engagement with cellular damage provided the first evidence for what we now call neuroinflammation. His methodical approach and detailed observations proved that glial cells are not passive bystanders but central, active players that sense, respond to, and shape the course of brain diseases. The English translation and the original German text can be found in the attachment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.